ABSTRACT
Objective@#This study aimed to overview and assess the effectiveness of the policies and regulations that have governed new drug access in Korea, and to propose policies to enhance patient access to drugs, particularly for new innovative medicines. @*Methods@#We approached drug access issues in two perspectives: approval lag (or availability) and reimbursement lag (or affordability). The issues were identified and evaluated through the review of literature, public documents, reports published by the government agencies and private organizations, and news articles. @*Results@#To shorten approval lag, it is recommended to hire and train more reviewers at the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Increasing user fees to a realistic level can facilitate this process. To reduce reimbursement lag, flexible incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold, alternative cost-effectiveness evaluation, and establishment of funding source other than the national health insurance are identified as the areas to be improved. @*Conclusion@#The current policies and regulations had to be supplemented by new systems to drastically promote patient accessibility to new drugs, consequently in order to promote national public health.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#This study aimed to overview and assess the effectiveness of the policies and regulations that have governed new drug access in Korea, and to propose policies to enhance patient access to drugs, particularly for new innovative medicines. @*Methods@#We approached drug access issues in two perspectives: approval lag (or availability) and reimbursement lag (or affordability). The issues were identified and evaluated through the review of literature, public documents, reports published by the government agencies and private organizations, and news articles. @*Results@#To shorten approval lag, it is recommended to hire and train more reviewers at the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Increasing user fees to a realistic level can facilitate this process. To reduce reimbursement lag, flexible incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold, alternative cost-effectiveness evaluation, and establishment of funding source other than the national health insurance are identified as the areas to be improved. @*Conclusion@#The current policies and regulations had to be supplemented by new systems to drastically promote patient accessibility to new drugs, consequently in order to promote national public health.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Molecular imaging such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can provide the crucial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information of a drug non-invasively at an early stage of clinical drug development. Nevertheless, not much has been known how molecular imaging has been actually used in drug development studies.METHODS: We searched PubMed using such keywords as molecular imaging, PET, SPECT, drug development, and new drug, or any combination of those to select papers in English, published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2015. The information about the publication year, therapeutic area of a drug candidate, drug development phase, and imaging modality and utility of imaging were extracted.RESULTS: Of 10,264 papers initially screened, 208 papers met the eligibility criteria. The more recent the publication year, the bigger the number of papers, particularly since 2010. The two major therapeutic areas using molecular imaging to develop drugs were oncology (47.6%) and the central nervous system (CNS, 36.5%), in which efficacy (63.5%) and proof-of-concept through either receptor occupancy (RO) or other than RO (29.7%), respectively, were the primary utility of molecular imaging. PET was used 4.7 times more frequently than SPECT. Molecular imaging was most frequently used in phase I clinical trials (40.8%), whereas it was employed rarely in phase 0 or exploratory IND studies (1.4%).CONCLUSIONS: The present study confirmed the trend that molecular imaging has been more actively employed in recent clinical drug development studies although its adoption was rather slow and rare in phase 0 studies.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Molecular Imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Publications , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonABSTRACT
BACKGROUND@#Molecular imaging such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can provide the crucial pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic information of a drug non-invasively at an early stage of clinical drug development. Nevertheless, not much has been known how molecular imaging has been actually used in drug development studies.@*METHODS@#We searched PubMed using such keywords as molecular imaging, PET, SPECT, drug development, and new drug, or any combination of those to select papers in English, published from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2015. The information about the publication year, therapeutic area of a drug candidate, drug development phase, and imaging modality and utility of imaging were extracted.@*RESULTS@#Of 10,264 papers initially screened, 208 papers met the eligibility criteria. The more recent the publication year, the bigger the number of papers, particularly since 2010. The two major therapeutic areas using molecular imaging to develop drugs were oncology (47.6%) and the central nervous system (CNS, 36.5%), in which efficacy (63.5%) and proof-of-concept through either receptor occupancy (RO) or other than RO (29.7%), respectively, were the primary utility of molecular imaging. PET was used 4.7 times more frequently than SPECT. Molecular imaging was most frequently used in phase I clinical trials (40.8%), whereas it was employed rarely in phase 0 or exploratory IND studies (1.4%).@*CONCLUSIONS@#The present study confirmed the trend that molecular imaging has been more actively employed in recent clinical drug development studies although its adoption was rather slow and rare in phase 0 studies.
ABSTRACT
The ‘equivalent-or-more-but-not-the-same-data’ provision in the Regulation on the Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of New Drug in Korea has served as the de facto data exclusivity term for any drug identical to a product subject to new drug reexamination. The legal debate that occurred between Abbott Korea and Hanmi in association with the approval of their sibutramine products, i.e., Reductil® vs. Slimmer®, showed why data exclusivity plays an important role to protect intellectual property of the innovator drug when incrementally modified drugs had to rely on the safety and efficacy data of the innovator drug for approval. The regulatory science and legal issues regarding the case of Reductil® vs Slimmer® were discussed, and the importance of data exclusivity was emphasized as a useful tool to protect intellectual property besides patent.
Subject(s)
Intellectual Property , Korea , MesylatesABSTRACT
Levofloxacin is a bactericidal broad spectrum antibiotic against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. A randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-way crossover study was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of Lectacin 250 mg tablet, a generic levofloxacin, to its reference drug, Cravit 250 mg tablet. Each period was separated by a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected until 24 h after dosing and plasma levofloxacin concentrations were determined using a high performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using K-BE Test 2007 and BA calc 2007 (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Cheongju-si, South Korea). The peak concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0-t)) for the generic and reference levofloxacin were 4.48+/-0.89 mg/L and 4.46+/- 0.95 mg/L, and 25.33+/-4.12 mg*h/L and 25.77+/-4.01 mg*h/L, respectively, leading to a geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval) of the generic to the reference levofloxacin of 1.0060 (0.9339-1.0842) and 0.9810 (0.9476-1.0159), respectively, for Cmax and AUC(0-t). Lectacin 250 mg tablet is bioequivalent to Cravit 250 mg tablet.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Chromatography, Liquid , Cross-Over Studies , Levofloxacin , Pharmacokinetics , Plasma , Tablets , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
The equivalence margin is the largest difference that is clinically acceptable between the test (or experimental) drug and the active control (or reference) drug. This paper discusses the scientific principles, along with the regulatory issues, that need to be addressed when determining the equivalence margin for the biosimilar product. The concept of assay sensitivity is introduced, and the ways to ensure assay sensitivity in the equivalence trial are emphasized. A hypothetical example is presented to show how an equivalence margin is determined. The regulatory agency should carefully assess if the equivalence margin of the biosimilar product was determined using a scientifically valid and clinically relevant approach, not subject to selection bias. This is important because the consumer risk of erroneously declaring equivalence when in fact it is not must be controlled conservatively low in the approval of any biosimilar products.
Subject(s)
Dietary Sucrose , Selection BiasABSTRACT
Se ha realizado un estudio que evalua el estado actual de la asistencia internacional de financiamiento para las actividades de salud con objeto de averiguar cuan eficaz podria ser la cooperacion internacional de financiamiento en el esfuerzo de lograr la salud para todos y el ritmo a que la misma deberia aumentar.Tal cooperacion puede proporcionar una contribucion importante, y tal vez suficiente aun cuando sea necesario realizar cambios primordiales en los procedimientos para suministrar la asistencia relacionada con la salud